JULIAN HARRY WALKER
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Biography
  • Purchase Wires Crossed
  • Contact

Again, N.B. Power is at a Crossroads and Proposing to Take the Wrong Road.                                                              Say NO to the massive 500-megawatt gas plant near beautiful Sackville, NB.

8/14/2025

3 Comments

 
Picture
A ProEnergy gas plant for peak electricity production in Houston, Texas
At a time when Planet Earth is coping with climate change and unprecedented wildfires, it is critical to reduce the use of fossil fuels for electricity production. NB Power’s unfolding plan to contract for construction of a 500-megawatt natural gas-powered plant in the Sackville area is absurd.

Furthermore, NB Power is asking to bypass rigorous review by the N.B. Energy and Utilities Board (NBEUB) for projects costing $50 million or more. NB Power is arguing that the fact that this gas-fired plant will be a “tolling” facility – not owned and run by the utility itself, meaning the project need not go through the normal NBEUB process. As William Shakespeare would say: “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.”

A better scent is evident with Saint John Energy’s, Burchill Wind Farm with its 42- megawatt capacity. The number is small, but the direction toward renewables is a good one, and offers NB Power a more enlightened, planet-friendly pathway to the future.

It’s time for Premier Susan Holt and her ministers to state all environmental and Energy and Utilities laws and regulations will be upheld to ensure a proper review of the mammoth gas-fired Sackville area plant which NB Power is now pursuing. Furthermore, all financial details, including the cost of linking any new power plant into the power grid should be open for public scrutiny.
Detailed financials are still being kept secret, but the project is expected to cost multi-millions of dollars. It would be owned and run a partnership of Rigs Energy Atlantic, its U.S. parent company, ProEnergy, and North Shore Mi’kmaq First Nation in the province’s Northeast. If built, the plant would operate under contract with NB Power, which would not have an equity stake, but would need to ink a 25-year power purchase agreement.

On the face of it, this appears to be a great deal for a very large U.S.-based corporation, at the expense of New Brunswickers.

 The best part of the arrangement would likely be the involvement of the First Nation, although it remains to be seen whether this would be an equity participation or merely a part of the funds spent as electricity is generated.

Advanced publicity says the plant would provide peaking power for more than 300,000 homes in the fast-growing Moncton area. N.B. Power wants this huge plant up and running by Aug. 1, 2028.

The project appears to have the support of both the federal and provincial governments, but no formal announcement has been made to date, showing that it is not a clear winner and may be a political hot potato.

The Holt government has had trouble settling with the federal Carney government on a New Brunswick project of “national importance” for the country. Possibilities which Premier Holt has mentioned to date include an Eastern gas pipeline, the environmentally sensitive Sisson mine project in the Nashwaak River valley and Point Lepreau Two.

Building and paying for a nuclear generating station is no small matter. Point Lepreau one took over eight years to build, and the cost zoomed from $480 million to $1.1 billion, not a huge number in today’s Trump era in the USA, but very large number at the time. A cost that contributed significantly to N.B. Power’s $6 billion debt.
​

There would be steep political cost if the Holt government and NB Power go ahead with this new gas fired generating facility. Not least of the political opposition could come from the Sackville area, which has been very strong in mounting opposition to emergency room closures and past social cutbacks.
3 Comments
Muriel Jarvis
8/15/2025 09:23:58 am

Great arguments Julian! As you say, this plan is absurd especially considering the present climate emergency .

Reply
Ann McAllister
8/15/2025 10:44:17 am

Even thought the federal Impact Assessment doesn't consider at this stage the project's impacts on climate change, I think that the tolling agreement alone is a bad deal for New Brunswickers. It commits NB Power, and ultimately ratepayers, to pyaments for electricity whether or not it's delivered, fuel supply costs, carbon pricing and environmental compliance costs, and new and rising prices with no public visibility. It's a poor deal for ratepayers, NB Power, and the climate.

Reply
Jessie Davies
8/22/2025 03:06:19 pm

NB should be in the Quebec balancing area in order to add more renewable generation. Hydro is necessary and we have little. The best generation is distributed, diversified and downsized.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    My Biography

    Picture

    Archives

    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023

Picture
Picture
Picture
© COPYRIGHT 2025. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Biography
  • Purchase Wires Crossed
  • Contact